GPU-accelerated infrastructure
High-performance GPU workstations run production trajectories continuously, so a 500 ns system finishes in days rather than months.
GPU-accelerated MD simulations from 100 ns to 5 µs using GROMACS, Desmond and AMBER workflows — delivered with the figures, data and interpretation your manuscript actually needs.
Real output from a delivered BioPC project — 25,001 frames projected onto the first two principal components.
Why researchers choose BioPC
Every project is run on dedicated hardware, documented end to end, and priced before a single nanosecond is computed.
High-performance GPU workstations run production trajectories continuously, so a 500 ns system finishes in days rather than months.
Standardised protocols and version-controlled analysis pipelines. Every figure in your report can be regenerated from the scripts we ship with it.
A clear written quotation before any work begins. No hidden computational charges, no surprise invoices for re-runs we recommended.
Figures, statistics and supporting files prepared to journal specification, with legends you can paste directly into a thesis or submission.
Services
Commission the whole workflow or any single stage. Systems already equilibrated elsewhere are welcome — we will validate them before production.
Everything between your raw structure and a stable, production-ready system.
Continuous GPU production runs at the timescale your question actually requires.
The core stability panel every reviewer expects to see.
Which contacts hold, for how long, and what that means for affinity.
Collective motion and conformational landscapes beyond the standard panel.
Quantitative energetics with per-residue attribution.
Not sure which stages your project needs? Send the structure and your research question — we will scope it for you.
Get an exact quotationWhat you receive
Everything below ships with every completed project. If a journal asks for something else, we prepare it before you have to ask.
Sample report
A real 500 ns protein–protein project, redacted and reformatted: the full stability panel, interaction profiling, essential dynamics and MM/PBSA decomposition, with the interpretation text we would write for your manuscript.
No email required.
Project workflow
You are kept in the loop at each handover — equilibration plots before production starts, and a preliminary analysis before the final report is written.
Step 1
PDB / ligand / project details
Send a PDB ID or your own coordinates, the ligand file, and a sentence on what you want to learn. Docking poses from AutoDock, Vina, Glide or GOLD are all valid starting points.
Step 2
Force fields, solvation, ions
Protonation states assigned at your target pH, an appropriate force field chosen and justified, then solvation, neutralisation, minimisation and staged NVT/NPT equilibration.
Step 3
100 ns to 5 µs
Continuous production on dedicated GPUs with periodic integrity checks. Replicate runs available where the question demands statistical support.
Step 4
Trajectory, PCA, MM/PBSA
The full stability panel, interaction profiling, essential dynamics and binding free energy — each plotted to publication specification.
Step 5
Figures, data, interpretation
You receive figures, vectors, raw data, scripts and a written interpretation, with a revision round included for reviewer responses.
Simulation packages
Cost scales with system size and simulation length, so we quote per project rather than per page. These are the four configurations researchers ask for most.
Student and multi-system rates available. Replicate runs quoted separately.
Sample results gallery
Every plot below came out of a delivered BioPC project and is shown at the resolution and styling you would receive. Click any figure to enlarge.
Disclaimer. These figures are shown as examples of deliverable quality only. They are not for commercial or research use. If you use any of these figures in your own research, your research will be falsified and retracted.
Research areas we support
The methodology transfers; the interpretation does not. Tell us the biology and we will match the protocol to the question rather than the other way round.
Lead optimisation, scaffold comparison and residence-time reasoning.
Pose validation and interaction persistence after docking.
Conformational stability and target engagement of designed peptides.
Active-site dynamics and the effect of stabilising mutations.
Multi-epitope construct stability and receptor complex behaviour.
CDR loop flexibility and antigen interface characterisation.
Lipid-bilayer embedded systems with appropriate membrane force fields.
Protease, polymerase and spike-class targets with inhibitor series.
Interface energetics and hot-spot residue identification.
Allostery, collective motion and conformational free energy.
Track record
Simulation is only useful if it holds up under a reviewer's scrutiny. These are projects where it did.
BioPC contribution · 500 ns GROMACS production MD, DCCM, PCA/FEL and MM/PBSA
BioPC contribution · 200 ns triplicate simulations and MM/GBSA decomposition
BioPC contribution · 1 µs Desmond production run and interaction fraction analysis
BioPC contribution · System setup, 300 ns MD and essential dynamics
The convergence assessment and per-residue decomposition answered our second reviewer almost line by line. The revision was accepted without a further round.
We sent docking poses on a Monday and had a 200 ns trajectory with the full stability panel back within two weeks — figures already at journal resolution.
What set BioPC apart was receiving the analysis scripts. We reran the whole pipeline on a second ligand ourselves without paying for it twice.
Researchers we have worked with are based at
FAQ
The questions researchers actually send us before commissioning a project.
GROMACS, Desmond and AMBER-based workflows, selected per project. GROMACS is our default for protein–protein and membrane systems; Desmond where the Simulation Interaction Diagram is expected by the target journal; AMBER where the ligand parameterisation or MM/PBSA route calls for it.
Yes. We routinely start from AutoDock, AutoDock Vina, Glide, GOLD and HADDOCK outputs. Send the top pose (or several, if you want them compared) and we handle protonation, parameterisation and equilibration from there.
Yes. Every project includes publication-formatted figures, drafted figure legends, an interpretation report and a supplementary package. We also support one revision round for reviewer comments on the simulation work.
Typically a few days to a few weeks, depending on system size and current queue load. A ~50,000-atom solvated complex generally completes within about a week of continuous GPU time; membrane systems and very large complexes take longer. You get a specific estimate in your quotation.
Yes. Confidentiality agreements are available for collaborative and industry projects, and we can work under your institution's template. Unpublished structures and ligand series are never used as examples without written permission.
At minimum: the protein (PDB ID or file), the ligand or binding partner, and your intended simulation length or scientific question. Your manuscript deadline helps us schedule the run realistically.
That is entirely your call. Most clients acknowledge the service; where our input is genuinely intellectual rather than technical, co-authorship can be discussed before work begins.
We report it plainly, with the evidence. A negative result found in 200 ns is far cheaper than one found by a reviewer, and we will advise whether a different pose, protonation state or longer sampling is worth attempting.
Request a MD Service
Send what you have — even just a PDB ID and a research question is enough to start. You will receive a written quotation with a simulation plan and a realistic timeline, usually within one working day.
Direct contact
What happens next